At SEAC 2001, the SEAC Committee for Student Affairs sponsored a student
workshop on strategies for writing successful applications for grants and fellowships.
The following are some notes from the workshop.
Click here for links to
Grants!
WRITING GRANT AND FELLOWSHIP
APPLICATIONS |
- comments from Amber VanDerwarker
on the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (annual stipend of $20,000 per
year for three years plus tuition and fees for three years of graduate
school)
- deadline in early
November
- will ask for college
and grad school transcripts and scores on the Graduate Record Examination
- take the GRE more
than once if you would like to improve your score
- the NSF will pay the
GRE registration fee for NSF applicants
- college seniors are
eligible, as are first-year and some second-year graduate students
- reviewers are not
necessarily specialists in archaeology, nor are they necessarily
archaeologists
- application essays
should demonstrate academic potential and an interest in new
directions in the scholarly study of your chosen topic
- the application will
ask you to list the grad schools to which you are applying
- comments from Greg
Wilson and Mark Rees on the NSF Dissertation Improvement Grant (up to
$12,000 to support fieldwork and collections research)
- no deadline
- no indirect costs are
covered
- identify a thematic
topic of interest to archaeologists from several regions and ideally a
topic of interest to scholars in other subfields of anthropology
- make clear and
convincing links between the broader topic of interest and the actual
steps in data analysis you will take to answer specific research
questions
- proposals can include
up to ten pages of text and five figures, or less than five figures and a
total of fifteen pages for text and figures, and a bibliography
- applications are
reviewed by at least three scholars, sometimes as many as six, and you
may recommend reviewers in your cover letter
- your proposal will be
reviewed by some people you recommend as well as others
- your bibliography
will also suggest ideas for reviewers
- applicants can apply for
funding to travel to museums or sites, to conduct fieldwork or laboratory
analyses, to hire consultants, and to purchase equipment and supplies
- successful and
unsuccessful applicants will receive anonymous review comments, and
unsuccessful applicants are eligible to and encouraged to revise and
resubmit
- ensure access to
collections or to sites before applying
- your dissertation
advisor is the principal investigator for your proposed project
- comments from Dawn
Ramsey about the National Historic Preservation Fund
- funding from NPS but
deadlines are set and proposals evaluated by individual SHPO
- matching grants
- overhead costs paid to
institutions
- comments from Vin
Steponaitis about Sigma Xi
- deadlines in May and
October
- online application
process
- applicants or their
academic advisors must be members
- ideal for small
amounts of money to fund absolute dates or other laboratory analyses of
archaeological material
- successful applicants
may reapply for further funding to support continuing analysis
- comments from Heather
Lapham about predoctoral and postdoctoral fellowships at the Smithsonian
Institution
- contact curators to
express your interest in these fellowships and the collections you want
to study
- visit the Smithsonian
web page to find out what materials the Smithsonian has that you might
want to study
- comments from Ken
Sassaman and Patrick Livingood about Wenner Gren
- deadlines in May and
November of every year
- proposals are
necessarily ranked against other proposals
- proposals that are not funded
in one round of applications may be ranked higher in another round
- not all proposals of
merit can necessarily be funded
· unsuccessful applicants do not receive
review comments
· only
successful applicants will be contacted by the foundation
· general comments from Ken Sassaman...
- academic careers demand
grantwriting expertise, and it is very worthwhile for graduate students to
begin applying for grants
- clarify your
methodologies and sampling strategies, and the links between your
methodology and the broader theoretical issues investigated in your
proposed project
- revise and resubmit your
proposals based on reviewer comments
- apply to funding
programs offered by state archaeological societies
- funding for
archaeology in
Florida
- awards for archaeological
projects by grad students in
Alabama
-
North Carolina Archaeological Society
Grants-in-Aid
- offer to help with
curating needs when relevant
- seek out your academic
advisors for guidance about writing grant and fellowship applications
· general comments from Vin Steponaitis...
- develop an innovative
and testable idea that reviewers will recognize needs to be studied and
therefore funded
- follow all the
guidelines of the grant or fellowship to which you are applying
- demonstrate your ability
to achieve the outcomes outlined in your proposal
- your curriculum vita
will help demonstrate your background and potential
- your methodology needs
to be carefully considered and well described in your proposal
- budget carefully
- don't forget expenses such
as supplies and copying
- don't underestimate
the time it takes to accomplish your objectives
- consider the review
comments carefully and calmly
- reapply reapply reapply
Click here for links to Grants!
webmaster | 1/16/08